Which states are gaining or losing population?

[T.S.]

Most on the list are no surprise, especially North Carolina being the top destination last year.

Originally Posted by United Van Lines

Press Release

A strong mobility pattern continued in 2006 as many Americans packed up their belongings and headed to the West and Southeast parts of the country, while the Central Northeast region of the country experienced an increase in residents departing. The statistics are among the findings of United Van Line’s 30th annual “migration” study that tracks where its customers, over the last 12 months, moved from and the most popular destinations. The findings were announced by Carl Walter, vice president of United Van Lines, the nation’s largest household goods mover.

United has tracked shipment patterns annually on a state-by-state basis since 1977. For 2006, the accounting is based on the 227,254 interstate household moves handled by United among the 48 contiguous states, as well as Washington, D.C. In its study, United classifies each state in one of three categories -- “high inbound” (55% or more of moves going into a state); “high outbound” (55% or more of moves coming out of a state); or “balanced.” Although the majority of states were in the “balanced” category last year, several showed more substantial population shifts.

MOVING IN

Known for hospitality and gracious style, the Southeast states welcomed many new residents in 2006, with North Carolina coming in as the top destination (64.0% inbound). South Carolina (60.6%) continued its 13-year inbound tradition, while Alabama (57.5%) experienced its fourth year as a high-inbound location. Although Tennessee saw less people move in this year (55.8% in 2006; 58.0% in 2005), it still captured a spot on the high-inbound list.

Although not considered “high inbound,” other southeastern states also greeted new residents. Kentucky (52.9%) continued its five-year inbound trend; Georgia (53.9%) continued its 25-year trend as an inbound state; and Mississippi (50.1%) boasted a 3.2% increase in moves to its state as compared to 2005.

Supporting the idea that Americans still believe there is fortune to be found in the West, the Western portion of the country emerged as a top migration spot. Capturing the No. 2-inbound ranking, Oregon (62.5%) sustained its 19-year, high-inbound trend. While still a high-inbound state, Arizona (55.4%) saw roughly 5% less people move in than last year; however, Nevada (59.9%) continued its lucky streak of being high inbound since 1986.

Both New Mexico (57.9% inbound; a 3.7% increase) and Utah (56.0% inbound; nearly 6% increase) saw a rise of incoming residents as compared to last year’s data. Idaho’s (59.3% inbound) high-inbound ranking has held steady for the past 19 years; and Montana (55.0% inbound) retained its five-year inbound status.

Although not considered “high inbound,” other Western states witnessed increases of incoming moves as compared to last year: Colorado (54.7% inbound) continued its four-year inbound trend and had 1.2% increase, and Wyoming (54.4% inbound) boasted a 4.3% increase.

Rounding out the of high-inbound list are Washington, D.C. (57.9%), which has remained inbound since the first year of the study, and South Dakota (55.9%), which enjoyed its first high-inbound year since 1994.

Some other noteworthy inbound-migration states in 2006:

* Texas (54.6%) continued inbound movement since 1989 and saw slightly (0.7%) more people move in as compared to last year.
* After being outbound last year, Nebraska (52.5% inbound) turned a new leaf and has 3.2% more moves in as compared to 2005.
* Although it is considered a balanced state, Oklahoma (50.0%) saw a 3% increase over last year’s numbers.
* This year marked the first time in 25 years that Minnesota (51.3%) saw more people entering than leaving.

MOVING OUT

States in the Central Northeast generally showed an outbound trend, according to United’s records. Ranked No. 2 on the high-outbound list last year, Michigan (66.0%) moved up a spot to tie for the top outbound state on this year’s list. Michigan saw a 2.1% increase over its 2005 numbers.

Other Central Northeast states that made the high-outbound list were: New York (59.5%), which has been an outbound state since the survey was established; Indiana (58.2%), which has been high outbound since 1993; and Illinois (55.7%), which has been high outbound since the survey’s inception. Also continuing outbound traditions, New Jersey (60.9%, outbound since 1997), Pennsylvania (57.0%, high outbound for the past three years), and Ohio (55.8%, outbound since 1992) saw residents depart.

Rounding out the high-outbound states, Louisiana (56.4%) continued its two-year, high-outbound trend, but did see 1.5% less people leave as compared to last year’s numbers. Continuing its reign as the top outbound state of 2005, North Dakota (66.0%) tied this year with Michigan for the state that lost the most residents. The year of 2006 marked the eleventh consecutive year that North Dakota has been classified as high outbound.

Not identified as “high outbound,” but following the outbound trend in the Central Northeastern part of the country, Connecticut (52.4%) saw its fourth successive year of out-migration and Maryland (54.1%) continued its 15-year outbound tradition.

Some other noteworthy outbound states in this year’s study were:

* California (52.4%) saw its lowest outbound percentage in four years.
* Missouri (51.8%) continued its 12-year outbound trend and had 1% more residents leave as compared to last year.
* Wisconsin (53.2%) witnessed its lowest outbound influx since 2000.


Walter said the United Van Lines study, through the years, has been shown to accurately reflect the general migration patterns in various regions of the country. He also noted that real estate firms, financial institutions, and other observers of relocation trends regularly use the United data in their business planning and analysis activities.

http://www.unitedvanlines.com/mover/...tudy-04-07.htm

[cleozmom]

Not too surprised to see Idaho's inbound figures.

[a1m1700]

Originally Posted by T.S.

Most on the list are no surprise, especially North Carolina being the top destination last year.

No Arizona? I thought Phoenix was the fastest growing city.

[kdm31091]

Well I'm glad most of the states I like save for Florida and Cali (which was expected almost any year of their existence) are experiencing huge growth or loss. I don't want somewhere that will be an overcrowded dump in 10 years nor an abandoned wasteland.

Yeah, most of those places are not much of a surprise except maybe Idaho. I do know it's growing, but I don't get why. Is it people from California or something? I just don't know the draw to Idaho. Sorry if I'm being ignorant.

[T.S.]

Originally Posted by kdm31091

Well I'm glad most of the states I like save for Florida and Cali (which was expected almost any year of their existence) are experiencing huge growth or loss. I don't want somewhere that will be an overcrowded dump in 10 years nor an abandoned wasteland.

Yeah, most of those places are not much of a surprise except maybe Idaho. I do know it's growing, but I don't get why. Is it people from California or something? I just don't know the draw to Idaho. Sorry if I'm being ignorant.

I think it is California people cashing out on their crazy overpriced homes and running with the money. The Boise area actually looks surprisingly nice.

[jabm67]

We'll see what's happened when we get the numbers from the 2010 Census.

[RAINBOWWAVES]

I moved here to my town of Port Saint Lucie in 2001...it had all of about 50,000 ppl...it now has well over 150,000. I had read somewhere that a good amt of growth in every state was illegal aliens and ppl from the other side of the earth. Unless one is filthy rich, it really doesn't matter where you go, it is or will be crowded.

[RodFarlee]

The U.S. Census Bureau does annual surveys of lots of things, including migration patterns. From the "street level", it isn't sheer numbers (like the 190,000 per year from NY to FL, or the 99,000 per year leaving CA) that affect the character of a place as much as the percentage of the population that is moving each year.

States with the largest annual percentage migration flows (and their major sources or destinations) are:

NV +2.3% (CA)
AZ +1.2% (CA)
FL +1.1% (NY)
ID +0.7% (CA)
ME NH DE +0.6%
GA NC SC +0.5%

NE IA -0.3%
KS UT LA NJ -0.4%
ND IL -0.6%
MA -0.7%
NY -1.0% (FL)

Metro areas with the largest percentage annual immigration are the
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario "Inland Empire" 2.3%,
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater 1.5%, and
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale 1.4%.

Those with the largest percentage annual out-migration are
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont -1.5%, followed by
New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island -1.1%,
Boston-Cambridge-Quincy -1.0%, and
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana -0.9%.

Among smaller cities with the highest immigation rates are
Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ 3.4%,
Homosassa Springs, FL 3.3%, and
East Stroudsburg, PA 2.9%, followed by
Daphne-Fairhope, AL and Seaford, DE.

Smaller cities with the highest out-migration rates are
New Bern, NC -0.7%,
Jamestown-Dunkirk-Fredonia, NY -0.5%, and
Lumberton, NC -0.4%.

These levels of migration strongly affect the character of these places.